PCD

Observations: PCD, QC, PCD Observation, 169685

in

Hi Jim,

PCD Obsno, 169685 doesn't appear to have a coordinate mapped.  Should this mapped based on the entered Township Range Section?

Thx, Angie

 

PCD, QC, PCD Observation 170865

in

Hi Jim,

PCD observation 170865 doesn't have a matching point line or polygon mapped for it.  I assume it needs an associated feature. 

Also, it occurs at the same general location as observation 161930, I wonder if they are connected somehow?  Below is a screen shot circling where the observation 170865 should generally be mapped and where 161930 is currently located.

Thx, Angie

PCD, QC, PCD Observations: 172464, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 72, 75

in

Hi again Jim,

Here's a list of  PCD obsnos that do not have an associated feature mapped.  It looks like they all are Michael Mancuso observations associated with EO #6 of Eriogonum ochrocephalum var. calcareum, Calcareous Buckwheat.  I am wondering if there is anything mappable for these observations?  If not, how do we want to manage these types of 'unmappable' revisits to an EO?

Thx, Angie