- Species Diversity
- Technical Reports
Submitted by idfg-aschmidt on August 1, 2012 - 3:56pm
PCD Obsno, 169685 doesn't appear to have a coordinate mapped. Should this mapped based on the entered Township Range Section?
Submitted by idfg-aschmidt on August 1, 2012 - 3:29pm
PCD observation 170865 doesn't have a matching point line or polygon mapped for it. I assume it needs an associated feature.
Also, it occurs at the same general location as observation 161930, I wonder if they are connected somehow? Below is a screen shot circling where the observation 170865 should generally be mapped and where 161930 is currently located.
Submitted by idfg-aschmidt on August 1, 2012 - 2:34pm
Hi again Jim,
Here's a list of PCD obsnos that do not have an associated feature mapped. It looks like they all are Michael Mancuso observations associated with EO #6 of Eriogonum ochrocephalum var. calcareum, Calcareous Buckwheat. I am wondering if there is anything mappable for these observations? If not, how do we want to manage these types of 'unmappable' revisits to an EO?
What is this?
We use the IFWIS Blog to keep our staff, cooperators and the public updated on what we are working on, what's new and share tips about using our software and website.
The content of the IFWIS Blog is often highly technical, but we try our best to keep our posts accessible and jargon-free. When this is not possible, we'll link to other resources online to provide background. Thanks for reading and please follow our blog for updates.
- IFWIS RSS Feed
- Daily Email Digest (All Public Content)
- Or follow just one of the many topic-specific tag feeds or pages below.
- 1 of 7