- Species Diversity
Submitted by idfg-pbond on July 2, 2013 - 4:33pm
The Idaho Sage Grouse Task Force (SGTF) appointed by the Governor of Idaho, created an Idaho alternative in response to the BLM's, "A Framework to Identify Greater Sage-grouse Preliminary Priority Habitat and Preliminary General Habitat for Idaho" as seen at http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/id/wildlife/sensitive_species/sagegrouse_habitat.Par.90238.File.dat/Idaho_Sage-grouse_Priority_Areas_White_Paper_Final_April_26_2012_508.pdf The SGTF split the BLM's designated PPH and PGH into 4 'Conservation Areas', two located North of the Snake River and two South. The Conservation Areas are split into Management Zones attributed with Core, Important, and General. This shapefile is supporting information for the content within the 'DRAFT Federal Alternative of Governor C.L. Butch Ottter For Greater Sage-Grouse Management in Idaho, June 28th, 2012' at https://fishandgame.idaho.gov/content/sites/default/files/CLBO-Draft-Sag...
For more information about the SGTF visit http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/public/wildlife/?getPage=310.
Historically, IDFG Biologists used a data management system, called Biotics, to track Element information and aide in the development of conservation ranks. Biotics managed the information in the background and ranking often involved a fair amount of qualitative assessment and judgment by an expert or group. This process had issues with consistency and repeatability. In 2004, NatureServe formed the Element Ranking Working Group to address these issues and to develop a ranking protocol. The major product of this group was a ranking calculator, which IDFG biologists now rely on for assisting in the assignment of status ranks. This ranking system is intended to be free of bias, transparent to users, and allow for consistency of application within and between groups. It also provides documentation for tracking of the decision process.
What’s necessary to accurately rank species in Idaho?
The short answer is the knowledge of rarity, trends and threats for a species. NatureServe has developed a rank calculator to enable the calculation of conservation status ranks for a “unit of biological diversity”, also known as an “Element.” This Element may be a species or natural community.
Don’t you need an EO?
No, Element Occurrence (EO) records are not necessary for ranking a species or community. A collection of criteria, which can include EO’s, are used in assessing and determining an Element’s conservation status rank.
NatureServe provides a Microsoft Excel workbook that allows for automatic calculation of an element conservation status rank from data that is entered into the forms and tables included within the workbook. The “NatureServe Conservation Status Assessments: Rank Calculator Version 2.0”, along with supporting material can be downloaded at http://www.natureserve.org/publications/ConsStatusAssess_RankCalculator-v2.jsp. Supporting materials include: Factors for Assessing Extinction Rate and Methodology for Assigning Ranks. Use of this tool allows for more consistent, accurate, repeatable and transparent ranking of species.
The rank calculator uses three categories (rarity, trends and threats), with a cumulative ten conservation status factors, of which eight are “core” factors, for assessing conservation status. These factors, by category, used to assess conservation status are:
• Rarity: Population Size, Range Extent, Area of Occupancy, Number of Occurrences, Number of Occurrences or Percent Area with Good Viability/Ecological Integrity, and Environmental Specificity (used only when the Number of Occurrences and Area of Occupancy are unknown);
• Trends: Long-term and Short-term Trend in population size or area;
• Threats: Threat Impact (generated by considering the scope and severity of the major threats), and Intrinsic Vulnerability (used only if Threat Impact is unknown).
A rank can be assigned with as few as two of the eight core factors, including either: 2 rarity categories (one of which must be either Range Extent or Area of Occupancy), or 1 rarity and 1 trend or 1 threat category.
Posted by idfg-jstrickland at 04/05/2012 in
At the Northwest Scientific Association meeting last week, I attended an afternoon session that introduced me to a great online conservation project database, The Conservation Registry: http://www.conservationregistry.org/about. This website allows you to share and search for data, maps, and documentation related to conservation projects across the country.
From there website:
Posted by idfg-pbond at 04/02/2012 in
What is this?
We use the IFWIS Blog to keep our staff, cooperators and the public updated on what we are working on, what's new and share tips about using our software and website.
The content of the IFWIS Blog is often highly technical, but we try our best to keep our posts accessible and jargon-free. When this is not possible, we'll link to other resources online to provide background. Thanks for reading and please follow our blog for updates.
- IFWIS RSS Feed
- Daily Email Digest (All Public Content)
- Or follow just one of the many topic-specific tag feeds or pages below.
- 1 of 6